Sunday, October 14, 2012


So it's October 14th, and many of us have received our absentee ballots. Given the time left, I have decided to make one last entry in regards to this electoral campaign cycle.

For those of you who've made your decision's, I don't expect to change your mind, I'd love to think that I was that convincing, but I've no expectation of that. This is more a statement of how I have arrived at my own personal choice to vote for the Democrats.

Notice that I didn't specify who, or for what office, but for a party. For those of you who're wondering where this sudden dedication to a party has come from, please don't be fooled. I am not a party person, I don't typically vote for parties, I prefer to vote for people. Political parties, are to my mind as divisive and corrupting as special interest lobbying groups. But it's the system we have, and we have to work with what we have before we can change it.

So what is my motivation towards voting specifically along one party line? Simple, I want to defeat the party that is absolutely determined to gut the last few socially responsible plans we have that make this country great.

I want to prevent, a third and quite possibly fourth military action/occupation of a middle eastern country. I'm not sure your aware of this, but we've been hemorrhaging money at a sickening pace in Afghanistan.

I want to punish a party whom after 12 years of domination in the House & Senate, eight of which included  a republican puppet president,  who ran up more debt than any other group before them. Case in point, two wars on credit - i.e. not included in any budget until after they lost the 2008 campaign cycle. This is the same party that has the gall to lay blame and point fingers at an administration that on day one entered an office with well over a trillion dollars of DECLARED DEBT, a near depression and certainly the worst WORLD RECESSION we've seen since.

Clearly the focus of this election cycle is on the Executive Office, and while I will concentrate on that in a moment, I would remind you of who and what branch of the government holds the greatest blame for all of our biggest complaints.

The easiest way to remember this is a familiar saying, "The President proposes, Congress disposes." 
  •  The President (Executive Office) can only propose idea's to deal with problems, such as debt, unemployment, immigration, health-care, budgets, economic stimulus, etc...etc...
  • The Congress disposes of those ideas and all others presented, I.E. - they have primary responsibility for the creation, passage and promulgation of laws that effect us every damn day!
So when you direct your frustration at the President, you better damn well look at the facts about who's constantly reached across the aisle, and with concessions so large he incurred massive decent within his own party. Shit, I've said it more times than I can count, "Obama has been one of finest Conservative Presidents we've ever had!"

The Republican Party has been working towards one end since their 2008 Presidential Campaign loss. They have at every turn rejected or filibustered nearly every proposal suggested by this administration, and they have done so with no regard to the outcome.

No group, no party of any kind bares more responsibility for the near financial default that occurred last year when the Republicans balked at signing a budget, and they are entirely responsible for the resulting credit downgrade of this nation.

Personally, I would like to ask them who the hell they believe they work for? The public, or the anti-tax lobbyist Grover Norquist? Why does this man have more power, more influence over the Republican party, than the people who voted for them?

Please remember, this election isn't only about the Presidency, it's about the party that will either have a majority or minority large enough to effect real change. Even if the Democrats gain majority in the House and Senate, it's got to be large enough to counter the threat of a wildly abused filibuster.


The answer to this question for me, goes back to what I said earlier, I prefer to vote for a person rather than a party. The criteria I use is basic, their words, actions and accomplishments.

I've not been thrilled with this administration on many fronts, but I have never felt at any time that the man in that office was working for any other reason than the greater good of this country. The fact that this nation didn't suffer a full blown Depression, is a testament to this administration and I think will one day be acknowledged by those who record history.

Obama's opponents not only represent a political Party that has brought us to near financial collapse, but their own history of words, actions and accomplishments, provide all the reasons I need to vote against them.

I'm not going to further bore you with the facts behind their glorified biographies, they are freely available online. Do your research, don't rely entirely on the primary media outlets, and certainly not FOX "NEWS".

Ultimately it comes down to a catch phrase I keep hearing, "This is not your father's conservative party." Have you heard that? Well, it's the truth. The Paul Ryan Party, the Tea Party, call it what you want, those who call themselves members, consist of two groups. Those who want all the benefits they've been provided since the founding of the Constitution, but don't want to pay for it, and those that know the easiest way to pillage what's left of this country's greatest social programs, is to convince that latter half, that they don't need them.

Imagine if you will, had George W. Bush been successful with his privatization of Social Security prior to the financial meltdown of 2008, and had I taken all my then earned benefits and asked some money manager to invest them? Holy shit, I'd have nothing, and the big money supporters of privatization would have had even bigger offshore bank accounts.

These extremist groups want to run our government based upon the purest model of Friedmanist economic principles they can get us to sign off on. If you're not familiar with Milton Friedman, or his economic principles, you can easily perform a Google search and read the brief bio on him in Wikipedia. It provides a rather benign portrait of who he was and what he was responsible for, but I put it to you that this man, and his economic principles were the worst kind of idea's ever. There is a reason why they were so very admired and administered by dictators throughout South America.

If you want the best example of what can happen to a progressive economy when a democratic society goes full tilt Friedmanism, look no further than Chile in the mid 1970's. Or read the book, "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein.  I guarantee you will find it to be one of the most riveting and at the same time, hardest reads ever. I had to put in down multiple times, not because it was poorly written, but because it was so damn well written.

09/22/13: Had to update this...latest location for a video link to "The Shock Doctrine".

Anyway, if you've managed to read this far, thanks for putting up with me.

Much Love,

Just Joe